<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 925 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260051</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeals for AY 2005-06 and 2006-07, partly allowing the assessee&#039;s Cross Objection. The decisions focused on disallowances under Section 14A, classification of share transaction gains, deduction of preliminary expenses under Section 35D, and addition of doubtful loan provisions under Section 115JB. Consistency in tax treatment and adherence to legal precedents were emphasized.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2022 18:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386352" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 925 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260051</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeals for AY 2005-06 and 2006-07, partly allowing the assessee&#039;s Cross Objection. The decisions focused on disallowances under Section 14A, classification of share transaction gains, deduction of preliminary expenses under Section 35D, and addition of doubtful loan provisions under Section 115JB. Consistency in tax treatment and adherence to legal precedents were emphasized.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260051</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>