<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 924 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260050</link>
    <description>Interest on NPA advances was held not to accrue as real income under RBI prudential norms, so it could not be taxed on accrual basis merely because the co-operative bank followed the mercantile system. The Tribunal preferred the assessee-favourable view in the absence of any jurisdictional High Court ruling and in light of divergent non-jurisdictional authorities. It also held that section 145 could not compel taxation of income that had not actually accrued. The addition was therefore deleted and the deletion sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 May 2015 11:15:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386351" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 924 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260050</link>
      <description>Interest on NPA advances was held not to accrue as real income under RBI prudential norms, so it could not be taxed on accrual basis merely because the co-operative bank followed the mercantile system. The Tribunal preferred the assessee-favourable view in the absence of any jurisdictional High Court ruling and in light of divergent non-jurisdictional authorities. It also held that section 145 could not compel taxation of income that had not actually accrued. The addition was therefore deleted and the deletion sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260050</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>