https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170466 The government upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order, confirming that rebate claims for goods supplied to SEZ are admissible under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, read with Notification No. 19/2004-C.E. (N.T.). The procedural lapse of not submitting the Bill of Export was not sufficient to deny the rebate claims. The revision application filed by the department was rejected, and the order-in-appeal was upheld. en-us Mon, 14 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 May 2015 18:46:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170466 The government upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order, confirming that rebate claims for goods supplied to SEZ are admissible under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, read with Notification No. 19/2004-C.E. (N.T.). The procedural lapse of not submitting the Bill of Export was not sufficient to deny the rebate claims. The revision application filed by the department was rejected, and the order-in-appeal was upheld. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 14 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170466