<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 1032 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170469</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete various additions made by the AO, including unexplained investments, interest payments, and suppression of sale considerations. The Tribunal relied on precedents and held that the additions lacked proper evidence or were deductible under relevant tax provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 May 2015 11:33:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386309" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 1032 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170469</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete various additions made by the AO, including unexplained investments, interest payments, and suppression of sale considerations. The Tribunal relied on precedents and held that the additions lacked proper evidence or were deductible under relevant tax provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170469</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>