https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170464 The government upheld the decision to reject the rebate claim due to non-compliance with ARE-1 procedures, non-submission of original/duplicate copies of ARE-1 endorsed by customs, and failure to provide Central Excise Invoices. As a result, the export of duty-paid goods could not be established, leading to the inadmissibility of the rebate claim under Rule 18 of Central Excise Rules, 2002, read with Notification No. 19/2004-C.E. (N.T.). The appellate authority's orders were affirmed, and the revision application was dismissed for lacking merit. en-us Tue, 30 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 May 2015 18:40:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170464 The government upheld the decision to reject the rebate claim due to non-compliance with ARE-1 procedures, non-submission of original/duplicate copies of ARE-1 endorsed by customs, and failure to provide Central Excise Invoices. As a result, the export of duty-paid goods could not be established, leading to the inadmissibility of the rebate claim under Rule 18 of Central Excise Rules, 2002, read with Notification No. 19/2004-C.E. (N.T.). The appellate authority's orders were affirmed, and the revision application was dismissed for lacking merit. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 30 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170464