<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 908 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260034</link>
    <description>The court approved the Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, merging the transferor company with the transferee company. The share exchange ratio indicated no shares allotted to transferor company shareholders due to it being a wholly owned subsidiary. Board approvals were unanimous, and dispensation of shareholder and creditor meetings was granted. Statutory compliance was upheld, resolving the appointed date discrepancy, maintaining the original date. The court sanctioned the scheme, directing compliance and dissolution of the transferor company without winding-up, imposing costs on the petitioners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2015 11:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386285" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 908 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260034</link>
      <description>The court approved the Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, merging the transferor company with the transferee company. The share exchange ratio indicated no shares allotted to transferor company shareholders due to it being a wholly owned subsidiary. Board approvals were unanimous, and dispensation of shareholder and creditor meetings was granted. Statutory compliance was upheld, resolving the appointed date discrepancy, maintaining the original date. The court sanctioned the scheme, directing compliance and dissolution of the transferor company without winding-up, imposing costs on the petitioners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260034</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>