<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 906 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260032</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to delete the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) based on the genuine beliefs and disclosure of all relevant details by the assessee, as highlighted in the CIT(A)&#039;s order and supported by legal precedents. The Tribunal found that there was no concealment or intention to evade taxes, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirmation of the penalty deletion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 13:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386283" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 906 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260032</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to delete the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) based on the genuine beliefs and disclosure of all relevant details by the assessee, as highlighted in the CIT(A)&#039;s order and supported by legal precedents. The Tribunal found that there was no concealment or intention to evade taxes, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirmation of the penalty deletion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260032</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>