<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 898 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260024</link>
    <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing the mandatory referral for property valuation under section 50C(2) when fair market value is disputed. The Assessing Officer was directed to refer the property to the DVO for valuation before computing capital gains, as per the statutory requirement. The ITAT set aside previous decisions and remanded the case for proper valuation and subsequent capital gains computation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 May 2015 06:04:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386275" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 898 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260024</link>
      <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing the mandatory referral for property valuation under section 50C(2) when fair market value is disputed. The Assessing Officer was directed to refer the property to the DVO for valuation before computing capital gains, as per the statutory requirement. The ITAT set aside previous decisions and remanded the case for proper valuation and subsequent capital gains computation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260024</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>