<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 889 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260015</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on various sources of cash deposits, including the opening cash balance, credit card transactions, foreign tour reimbursements, and the gift from the mother. The lack of substantial evidence and inconsistencies in documentation led to the rejection of the assessee&#039;s claims, emphasizing the importance of verifiable proof in income assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2015 17:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386266" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 889 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260015</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on various sources of cash deposits, including the opening cash balance, credit card transactions, foreign tour reimbursements, and the gift from the mother. The lack of substantial evidence and inconsistencies in documentation led to the rejection of the assessee&#039;s claims, emphasizing the importance of verifiable proof in income assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260015</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>