https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170454 Delay in refiling objections under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is not subject to the same absolute limitation bar as the original filing, where the Section 34 application was lodged within time and defects were later cured. The court may therefore consider condonation of refiling delay, but only on a strict, fact-specific showing of diligence and sufficient cause, consistent with the Act's objective of expeditious arbitral finality. On the facts, an inordinate and unexplained 166-day delay was not justified, so condonation was refused. en-us Thu, 07 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 May 2015 12:55:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170454 Delay in refiling objections under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is not subject to the same absolute limitation bar as the original filing, where the Section 34 application was lodged within time and defects were later cured. The court may therefore consider condonation of refiling delay, but only on a strict, fact-specific showing of diligence and sufficient cause, consistent with the Act's objective of expeditious arbitral finality. On the facts, an inordinate and unexplained 166-day delay was not justified, so condonation was refused. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 07 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170454