<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 929 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170452</link>
    <description>The revision application filed by the Commissioner of Customs against the rejection of a drawback claim on re-exported goods was dismissed for lacking merit. The order-in-appeal allowing the drawback on re-export was upheld as the goods&#039; identity was deemed established based on the Shipping Bill declaration, despite the failure to match contents with stickers. The Government agreed that the goods met the requirements of Section 74 of the Customs Act, 1962, leading to the affirmation of the order-in-appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2015 13:06:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386254" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 929 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170452</link>
      <description>The revision application filed by the Commissioner of Customs against the rejection of a drawback claim on re-exported goods was dismissed for lacking merit. The order-in-appeal allowing the drawback on re-export was upheld as the goods&#039; identity was deemed established based on the Shipping Bill declaration, despite the failure to match contents with stickers. The Government agreed that the goods met the requirements of Section 74 of the Customs Act, 1962, leading to the affirmation of the order-in-appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>