<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 852 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259978</link>
    <description>Transfer pricing for a genuine commission-based agency segment must be determined on the actual international transaction and not by recharacterising it as trading; the foreign associated enterprise&#039;s cost of goods and multi-year comparables could not be imported, and current-year data was required. The resulting adjustment was set aside for fresh arm&#039;s length determination. Disallowance under section 40(a)(i) was not sustainable where the non-resident sale proceeds were not chargeable to tax in India and no permanent establishment existed, and the DTAA non-discrimination clause independently barred the disallowance. Disallowance under section 14A was also impermissible because no exempt income was earned during the year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 15:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386185" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 852 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259978</link>
      <description>Transfer pricing for a genuine commission-based agency segment must be determined on the actual international transaction and not by recharacterising it as trading; the foreign associated enterprise&#039;s cost of goods and multi-year comparables could not be imported, and current-year data was required. The resulting adjustment was set aside for fresh arm&#039;s length determination. Disallowance under section 40(a)(i) was not sustainable where the non-resident sale proceeds were not chargeable to tax in India and no permanent establishment existed, and the DTAA non-discrimination clause independently barred the disallowance. Disallowance under section 14A was also impermissible because no exempt income was earned during the year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259978</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>