<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 850 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259976</link>
    <description>In a job-work transfer pricing context, gold supplied free of cost by an associated enterprise was treated as a pass-through item, so its value could not be added to operating cost; the assessee was regarded as a job worker rather than a manufacturer. On the pricing method, the Tribunal accepted external comparable uncontrolled transactions for making charges in similar job-work arrangements and held that TNMM was unsuitable where a direct method was workable, so the CUP-based approach prevailed. Freight and insurance reimbursements supported by documentary evidence were treated as mere reimbursements and not income for transfer pricing adjustment, resulting in deletion of the additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2025 10:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386183" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 850 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259976</link>
      <description>In a job-work transfer pricing context, gold supplied free of cost by an associated enterprise was treated as a pass-through item, so its value could not be added to operating cost; the assessee was regarded as a job worker rather than a manufacturer. On the pricing method, the Tribunal accepted external comparable uncontrolled transactions for making charges in similar job-work arrangements and held that TNMM was unsuitable where a direct method was workable, so the CUP-based approach prevailed. Freight and insurance reimbursements supported by documentary evidence were treated as mere reimbursements and not income for transfer pricing adjustment, resulting in deletion of the additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>