<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 849 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259975</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the deletion of additions sustained by the CIT(A) regarding undisclosed GP rate, undisclosed stock, and undisclosed income in the investment of property. The decision underscored the necessity of corroborative evidence and compliance with legal provisions when making additions based on seized documents and third-party statements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2015 07:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386182" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 849 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259975</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the deletion of additions sustained by the CIT(A) regarding undisclosed GP rate, undisclosed stock, and undisclosed income in the investment of property. The decision underscored the necessity of corroborative evidence and compliance with legal provisions when making additions based on seized documents and third-party statements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259975</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>