<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 844 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259970</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the addition of interest received on bank deposits as income from other sources. However, the deletions of capital expenditure claimed under loan syndication charges, interest expenses on the term loan, and compensation paid for land acquisition were confirmed. The judgment was pronounced on May 14, 2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2015 06:33:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386177" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 844 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259970</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the addition of interest received on bank deposits as income from other sources. However, the deletions of capital expenditure claimed under loan syndication charges, interest expenses on the term loan, and compensation paid for land acquisition were confirmed. The judgment was pronounced on May 14, 2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259970</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>