https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170447 The appeal challenging duty demand and penalties for clandestinely clearing Electrical Distribution Transformers (EDTs) was dismissed. The lower authorities' findings, supported by APTRANSCO reports and buyer statements, concluded the appellant's involvement in clandestine removal. Despite the appellant's arguments and lack of evidence countering the department's claims, the decision was upheld. The appellant's failure to provide substantial evidence or refute the department's position led to the rejection of the appeal, affirming the lower authorities' decision. en-us Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 May 2015 18:55:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170447 The appeal challenging duty demand and penalties for clandestinely clearing Electrical Distribution Transformers (EDTs) was dismissed. The lower authorities' findings, supported by APTRANSCO reports and buyer statements, concluded the appellant's involvement in clandestine removal. Despite the appellant's arguments and lack of evidence countering the department's claims, the decision was upheld. The appellant's failure to provide substantial evidence or refute the department's position led to the rejection of the appeal, affirming the lower authorities' decision. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170447