<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 1002 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170444</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed as the denial of Cenvat credit for services related to Wind Mill Turbine installation was upheld due to lack of nexus with goods manufactured in the factory. The invocation of a longer period of limitation for demand was deemed unjustified as no suppression or misstatement was found. Consequently, the demand was held to be barred by limitation, leading to the setting aside of the penalty imposed on the parties involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 17:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386169" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 1002 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170444</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed as the denial of Cenvat credit for services related to Wind Mill Turbine installation was upheld due to lack of nexus with goods manufactured in the factory. The invocation of a longer period of limitation for demand was deemed unjustified as no suppression or misstatement was found. Consequently, the demand was held to be barred by limitation, leading to the setting aside of the penalty imposed on the parties involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>