<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 1000 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170437</link>
    <description>An application for out of turn hearing was allowed because the dispute concerned export benefit by way of drawback, and further delay in adjudication would postpone relief arising from exports made in 1999. The Tribunal held that an earlier miscellaneous order rejecting a similar request did not bar granting priority hearing in the present circumstances. On that basis, the appeal was directed to be listed forthwith on the specified earlier date, so that realization of the export benefit would not be delayed by pendency of the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 May 2015 17:55:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386165" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 1000 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170437</link>
      <description>An application for out of turn hearing was allowed because the dispute concerned export benefit by way of drawback, and further delay in adjudication would postpone relief arising from exports made in 1999. The Tribunal held that an earlier miscellaneous order rejecting a similar request did not bar granting priority hearing in the present circumstances. On that basis, the appeal was directed to be listed forthwith on the specified earlier date, so that realization of the export benefit would not be delayed by pendency of the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170437</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>