https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170432 The Tribunal allowed the applications to rectify errors in the Final Order, emphasizing the importance of correct valuation and procedural fairness in excise duty matters. The decision upheld the dutiability of the goods, with the appellant being liable for interest and penalty under the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal directed the original authority to re-quantify the duty amount based on the correct valuation method, ensuring the appellant's right to be heard and addressing discrepancies in the valuation process. en-us Mon, 23 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 May 2015 16:19:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170432 The Tribunal allowed the applications to rectify errors in the Final Order, emphasizing the importance of correct valuation and procedural fairness in excise duty matters. The decision upheld the dutiability of the goods, with the appellant being liable for interest and penalty under the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal directed the original authority to re-quantify the duty amount based on the correct valuation method, ensuring the appellant's right to be heard and addressing discrepancies in the valuation process. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 23 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170432