<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 1141 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170420</link>
    <description>Under the compounded levy regime, a later intimation to shift to actual-production assessment was treated as a prospective exit from the scheme rather than a retroactive change. The assessee&#039;s notice sent on 1-10-1998 could not affect the full financial year 1998-99, but it could operate from 1-4-1999, making actual-production assessment available for 1999-2000. On penalty, mandatory equal penalty provisions under the relevant rules were held not to be mechanically sustainable where they excluded discretion and ignored the circumstances of delay, so the penalty question required fresh consideration on the facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 09:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386131" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 1141 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170420</link>
      <description>Under the compounded levy regime, a later intimation to shift to actual-production assessment was treated as a prospective exit from the scheme rather than a retroactive change. The assessee&#039;s notice sent on 1-10-1998 could not affect the full financial year 1998-99, but it could operate from 1-4-1999, making actual-production assessment available for 1999-2000. On penalty, mandatory equal penalty provisions under the relevant rules were held not to be mechanically sustainable where they excluded discretion and ignored the circumstances of delay, so the penalty question required fresh consideration on the facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170420</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>