<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 926 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170425</link>
    <description>The High Court clarified that the principles of unjust enrichment do not apply to redemption fine and penalty in the case of misdeclared exports. The Court emphasized the distinction between duty and fine/penalty under the Act, leading to the setting aside of the Commissioner (Appeals) order and allowing the appeal for the refund of redemption fine and penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 May 2015 14:59:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386126" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 926 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170425</link>
      <description>The High Court clarified that the principles of unjust enrichment do not apply to redemption fine and penalty in the case of misdeclared exports. The Court emphasized the distinction between duty and fine/penalty under the Act, leading to the setting aside of the Commissioner (Appeals) order and allowing the appeal for the refund of redemption fine and penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170425</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>