<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 927 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170426</link>
    <description>The appeal against the disallowance of Cenvat Credit on welding electrodes as capital goods was dismissed. The Tribunal upheld the decision that welding electrodes used for repairs and maintenance did not qualify as capital goods for credit in the manufacturing process. Citing precedents and a Supreme Court decision, the Tribunal emphasized the binding nature of its decisions over conflicting High Court observations. The appellants&#039; argument that such credit should be allowed based on prior rulings was rejected, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 May 2015 15:03:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386125" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 927 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170426</link>
      <description>The appeal against the disallowance of Cenvat Credit on welding electrodes as capital goods was dismissed. The Tribunal upheld the decision that welding electrodes used for repairs and maintenance did not qualify as capital goods for credit in the manufacturing process. Citing precedents and a Supreme Court decision, the Tribunal emphasized the binding nature of its decisions over conflicting High Court observations. The appellants&#039; argument that such credit should be allowed based on prior rulings was rejected, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170426</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>