https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170419 The Tribunal dismissed the applications for a stay of the attachment order, affirming the Commissioner's decision based on the lack of evidence supporting the legal heirs' claim of ownership and control over the attached property. The Commissioner's finding of a transfer of title to M/s. Sensotherm (I) Pvt. Ltd. from 1993 remained unchallenged, and the legal heirs failed to establish control or possession over the property during the relevant period, leading to the dismissal of their applications. en-us Mon, 08 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 May 2015 13:19:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170419 The Tribunal dismissed the applications for a stay of the attachment order, affirming the Commissioner's decision based on the lack of evidence supporting the legal heirs' claim of ownership and control over the attached property. The Commissioner's finding of a transfer of title to M/s. Sensotherm (I) Pvt. Ltd. from 1993 remained unchallenged, and the legal heirs failed to establish control or possession over the property during the relevant period, leading to the dismissal of their applications. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 08 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170419