https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170405 The tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the lack of concrete evidence to support the duty demand based on assumptions of clandestine removal. It highlighted the necessity of corroborating statements with documentary evidence and proper quantification of shortages. The tribunal remanded the matter for reassessment, considering the appellant's contentions and the absence of specific evidence supporting the charge of clandestine removal. Ultimately, the appeal was allowed with consequential relief granted to the appellants. en-us Mon, 20 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Apr 2017 13:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170405 The tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the lack of concrete evidence to support the duty demand based on assumptions of clandestine removal. It highlighted the necessity of corroborating statements with documentary evidence and proper quantification of shortages. The tribunal remanded the matter for reassessment, considering the appellant's contentions and the absence of specific evidence supporting the charge of clandestine removal. Ultimately, the appeal was allowed with consequential relief granted to the appellants. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 20 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170405