https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170406 The Tribunal decided to condone the delay in filing the appeal due to the appellant's factory being closed when the order was dispatched. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's argument that serving the order on the Consultant was valid, stating the Consultant was not authorized to receive the order. The Tribunal allowed the COD application and scheduled the stay petition for a hearing on 10-4-2012. en-us Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 May 2015 11:20:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170406 The Tribunal decided to condone the delay in filing the appeal due to the appellant's factory being closed when the order was dispatched. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's argument that serving the order on the Consultant was valid, stating the Consultant was not authorized to receive the order. The Tribunal allowed the COD application and scheduled the stay petition for a hearing on 10-4-2012. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170406