<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 842 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259968</link>
    <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal, disallowing Cenvat credit on packaging services but permitting it for security services. Proportionate credit allocation was advised for telephone and chartered account services. Penalties were waived due to the appellant&#039;s reasonable belief in the admissibility of the credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2015 14:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386094" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 842 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259968</link>
      <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal, disallowing Cenvat credit on packaging services but permitting it for security services. Proportionate credit allocation was advised for telephone and chartered account services. Penalties were waived due to the appellant&#039;s reasonable belief in the admissibility of the credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259968</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>