<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 826 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259952</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Settlement Commission&#039;s jurisdiction under section 245C of the Income Tax Act, determining that the assessment proceedings were pending when the application was filed. It agreed with the Commission&#039;s view that the disclosure of additional income seemed prima facie full and true. The Court dismissed the petitioner&#039;s contentions on the service of the assessment order and the adequacy of the Commission&#039;s findings, ultimately rejecting the writ petition and discharging the rule.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2015 16:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386078" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 826 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259952</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Settlement Commission&#039;s jurisdiction under section 245C of the Income Tax Act, determining that the assessment proceedings were pending when the application was filed. It agreed with the Commission&#039;s view that the disclosure of additional income seemed prima facie full and true. The Court dismissed the petitioner&#039;s contentions on the service of the assessment order and the adequacy of the Commission&#039;s findings, ultimately rejecting the writ petition and discharging the rule.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259952</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>