<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 815 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259941</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was not justified as the assessee had disclosed all relevant information accepted during regular assessments. The Tribunal highlighted that penalty, if any, should be considered under Section 271AAA, not invoked by the AO, and set aside the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c). The appeals by the assessee were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 May 2015 06:44:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386067" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 815 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259941</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was not justified as the assessee had disclosed all relevant information accepted during regular assessments. The Tribunal highlighted that penalty, if any, should be considered under Section 271AAA, not invoked by the AO, and set aside the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c). The appeals by the assessee were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259941</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>