<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 886 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170403</link>
    <description>The court allowed the petition, quashing the attachment order dated 4.6.2008 and subsequent sale notice and auction. The petitioner-Bank, as a secured creditor, was held to have a superior charge over the mortgaged property compared to the state&#039;s claim for sales tax arrears. Respondents were restrained from selling the mortgaged property.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 18:08:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386056" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 886 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170403</link>
      <description>The court allowed the petition, quashing the attachment order dated 4.6.2008 and subsequent sale notice and auction. The petitioner-Bank, as a secured creditor, was held to have a superior charge over the mortgaged property compared to the state&#039;s claim for sales tax arrears. Respondents were restrained from selling the mortgaged property.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170403</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>