https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170402 The article examines whether the TTC/MIDC area fell within the municipal limits of NMMC, whether clause 7 of Schedule I to the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act barred municipal taxation in that area, whether quid pro quo could defeat the levy, whether the MIDC MOU unlawfully contracted out statutory functions, and whether mandamus could compel industrial-township notification. It notes that the municipal boundary was upheld as covering the TTC/MIDC area, clause 7 was read as not excluding municipal tax liability, quid pro quo was held inapplicable to municipal taxation, the MOU was treated as a permissible statutory arrangement, and no mandamus lay because the State's decision remained discretionary. en-us Thu, 08 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 May 2015 17:08:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170402 The article examines whether the TTC/MIDC area fell within the municipal limits of NMMC, whether clause 7 of Schedule I to the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act barred municipal taxation in that area, whether quid pro quo could defeat the levy, whether the MIDC MOU unlawfully contracted out statutory functions, and whether mandamus could compel industrial-township notification. It notes that the municipal boundary was upheld as covering the TTC/MIDC area, clause 7 was read as not excluding municipal tax liability, quid pro quo was held inapplicable to municipal taxation, the MOU was treated as a permissible statutory arrangement, and no mandamus lay because the State's decision remained discretionary. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 08 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170402