<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 957 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170402</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the petition, stating that the petitioners failed to establish sufficient grounds for invoking the Court&#039;s extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioners were granted the liberty to file appeals under Section 406 of the BPMC Act within eight weeks, recognizing their genuine pursuit of remedies through the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 17:08:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386053" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 957 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170402</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the petition, stating that the petitioners failed to establish sufficient grounds for invoking the Court&#039;s extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioners were granted the liberty to file appeals under Section 406 of the BPMC Act within eight weeks, recognizing their genuine pursuit of remedies through the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170402</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>