https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170400 The Supreme Court upheld the Division Bench's findings in a case concerning discriminatory trade zoning restrictions and licensing fees. The Court ruled that the differential treatment of stall-holders from Panchkuian Road was justified due to their unique circumstances, dismissing claims of discrimination. Additionally, the Court directed the appellants to pay arrears with interest based on their compliance with trade zoning regulations, setting specific repayment terms and rates. The appeals and writ petition were dismissed, with detailed instructions for compliance and no costs awarded. en-us Fri, 02 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 May 2015 16:42:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170400 The Supreme Court upheld the Division Bench's findings in a case concerning discriminatory trade zoning restrictions and licensing fees. The Court ruled that the differential treatment of stall-holders from Panchkuian Road was justified due to their unique circumstances, dismissing claims of discrimination. Additionally, the Court directed the appellants to pay arrears with interest based on their compliance with trade zoning regulations, setting specific repayment terms and rates. The appeals and writ petition were dismissed, with detailed instructions for compliance and no costs awarded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 02 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170400