<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 956 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170389</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand of the appellant&#039;s differential duty and imposed a penalty equal to the duty under Section 11AC, along with interest under Section 11AB. However, the penalties under Rules 209 and 210 were vacated. The appeal was disposed of with these modifications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 12:37:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386035" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 956 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170389</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand of the appellant&#039;s differential duty and imposed a penalty equal to the duty under Section 11AC, along with interest under Section 11AB. However, the penalties under Rules 209 and 210 were vacated. The appeal was disposed of with these modifications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170389</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>