https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170387 The Court found the unexplained delay in processing the detenu's representation to be a violation of Article 22(5) of the Constitution. The appeal was allowed, the High Court's order was set aside, and the detenu was directed to be released unless detained for another valid reason. The judgment stressed the importance of adhering to constitutional obligations and procedural safeguards in cases of preventive detention, highlighting the need for authorities to promptly address detenus' representations to uphold constitutional rights and prevent arbitrary deprivation of personal liberty. en-us Wed, 02 May 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 May 2015 12:30:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170387 The Court found the unexplained delay in processing the detenu's representation to be a violation of Article 22(5) of the Constitution. The appeal was allowed, the High Court's order was set aside, and the detenu was directed to be released unless detained for another valid reason. The judgment stressed the importance of adhering to constitutional obligations and procedural safeguards in cases of preventive detention, highlighting the need for authorities to promptly address detenus' representations to uphold constitutional rights and prevent arbitrary deprivation of personal liberty. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 02 May 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170387