<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 881 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170379</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Customs duty demands on three vessels (Smit Lumba, Posh Giant-I, and Salvaree) but directed a re-computation considering drawbacks. Duty demands on the other seven vessels were set aside. Confiscation of the three vessels under Section 111(f) was upheld, with reduced redemption fines and penalties for the appellants. Penalties on co-appellants were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2015 14:31:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=386019" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 881 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170379</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Customs duty demands on three vessels (Smit Lumba, Posh Giant-I, and Salvaree) but directed a re-computation considering drawbacks. Duty demands on the other seven vessels were set aside. Confiscation of the three vessels under Section 111(f) was upheld, with reduced redemption fines and penalties for the appellants. Penalties on co-appellants were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>