<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 798 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259924</link>
    <description>The Division Bench allowed Maheswari Ispat Limited some relief by modifying the repayment schedule to continue payments of Rs. 10 lacs per month for six months, with the option for further rescheduling. Failure to comply would lead to the order&#039;s recall, enabling Tata Capital Finance Limited to proceed with the winding-up process. The application was disposed of without costs, with both judges concurring on the decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 07:48:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385983" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 798 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259924</link>
      <description>The Division Bench allowed Maheswari Ispat Limited some relief by modifying the repayment schedule to continue payments of Rs. 10 lacs per month for six months, with the option for further rescheduling. Failure to comply would lead to the order&#039;s recall, enabling Tata Capital Finance Limited to proceed with the winding-up process. The application was disposed of without costs, with both judges concurring on the decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259924</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>