<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 776 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259902</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the principle of unjust enrichment did not apply due to the exemption for export of service. The case was remanded to the adjudicating authority for determining the quantum of service tax refund to be sanctioned. The appellant was instructed to provide all necessary details and cooperate for the verification process. The appeal was allowed by way of remand for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2015 08:20:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385920" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 776 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259902</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the principle of unjust enrichment did not apply due to the exemption for export of service. The case was remanded to the adjudicating authority for determining the quantum of service tax refund to be sanctioned. The appellant was instructed to provide all necessary details and cooperate for the verification process. The appeal was allowed by way of remand for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259902</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>