<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 758 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259884</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals for the respective assessment years, canceling the penalties imposed under section 272A(2)(k). The decision was based on the detailed analysis of the circumstances, emphasizing the technical nature of the delays and the absence of intentional non-compliance by the appellant. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of reasonable cause and bonafide belief in determining the applicability of penalties for delayed filing of TDS returns.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2015 10:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385902" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 758 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259884</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals for the respective assessment years, canceling the penalties imposed under section 272A(2)(k). The decision was based on the detailed analysis of the circumstances, emphasizing the technical nature of the delays and the absence of intentional non-compliance by the appellant. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of reasonable cause and bonafide belief in determining the applicability of penalties for delayed filing of TDS returns.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259884</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>