<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 756 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259882</link>
    <description>Classification of share and securities transactions as capital gains or business income depends on a cumulative assessment of intention at purchase, book treatment, use of borrowed funds, frequency and volume of dealings, holding period, delivery-based settlement, broker account conduct, and whether investment and trading portfolios are both maintained. A selective review of only some indicators was insufficient where the record also reflected substantial recurring transactions, debit and credit balances, interest expenditure, a large number of scrips, and portfolio-scheme gains not separately examined. The matter required independent year-wise scrutiny of all relevant facts and was sent back for fresh adjudication by the first appellate authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2015 08:15:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385900" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 756 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259882</link>
      <description>Classification of share and securities transactions as capital gains or business income depends on a cumulative assessment of intention at purchase, book treatment, use of borrowed funds, frequency and volume of dealings, holding period, delivery-based settlement, broker account conduct, and whether investment and trading portfolios are both maintained. A selective review of only some indicators was insufficient where the record also reflected substantial recurring transactions, debit and credit balances, interest expenditure, a large number of scrips, and portfolio-scheme gains not separately examined. The matter required independent year-wise scrutiny of all relevant facts and was sent back for fresh adjudication by the first appellate authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259882</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>