<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 750 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259876</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed all appeals for the assessment years 2007-08, 2008-09, and 2009-10, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions. The AO&#039;s additions were sustained only for purchases from M/s Praky Mercantile Pvt. Ltd. The Tribunal relied on the precedent set in a similar case and emphasized the lack of primary evidence to support the genuineness of the disputed purchases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2015 08:15:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385894" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 750 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259876</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed all appeals for the assessment years 2007-08, 2008-09, and 2009-10, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions. The AO&#039;s additions were sustained only for purchases from M/s Praky Mercantile Pvt. Ltd. The Tribunal relied on the precedent set in a similar case and emphasized the lack of primary evidence to support the genuineness of the disputed purchases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259876</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>