https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170344 The Tribunal set aside the order revoking the Customs House Agent (CHA) license, emphasizing that only the Commissioner who issued the license has the authority to revoke it. As the license was issued by the Commissioner of Customs, Pune, the Commissioner of Customs (General), Mumbai, lacked jurisdiction. The appellant's license was reinstated immediately, highlighting the importance of respecting jurisdictional boundaries in administrative actions. This decision reaffirms the significance of adherence to procedural requirements and jurisdictional limitations in license revocation, ensuring the protection of license holders' rights and upholding administrative law principles. en-us Mon, 18 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 May 2015 14:46:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170344 The Tribunal set aside the order revoking the Customs House Agent (CHA) license, emphasizing that only the Commissioner who issued the license has the authority to revoke it. As the license was issued by the Commissioner of Customs, Pune, the Commissioner of Customs (General), Mumbai, lacked jurisdiction. The appellant's license was reinstated immediately, highlighting the importance of respecting jurisdictional boundaries in administrative actions. This decision reaffirms the significance of adherence to procedural requirements and jurisdictional limitations in license revocation, ensuring the protection of license holders' rights and upholding administrative law principles. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 18 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170344