<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 668 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170349</link>
    <description>The Government upheld the penalty imposed under Section 116 of the Customs Act, 1962, for the shortfall in unloading Pet Coke. The applicants&#039; arguments regarding bilge water and tolerance limits were deemed unsupported by sufficient evidence. The revision application was rejected, and the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 May 2015 12:16:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385879" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 668 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170349</link>
      <description>The Government upheld the penalty imposed under Section 116 of the Customs Act, 1962, for the shortfall in unloading Pet Coke. The applicants&#039; arguments regarding bilge water and tolerance limits were deemed unsupported by sufficient evidence. The revision application was rejected, and the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170349</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>