<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1307 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170356</link>
    <description>Brand rate drawback claims initially filed within the prescribed 60-day period, with a further condonable 30 days, cannot be treated as time-barred merely because the department returned them for want of proper forum. Limitation must be computed from the original filing reflected in office records, not from the later resubmission after clarification. Where the first filing was timely, the claims must be examined on merits and rejection on limitation is unsustainable. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 May 2015 15:51:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385869" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1307 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170356</link>
      <description>Brand rate drawback claims initially filed within the prescribed 60-day period, with a further condonable 30 days, cannot be treated as time-barred merely because the department returned them for want of proper forum. Limitation must be computed from the original filing reflected in office records, not from the later resubmission after clarification. Where the first filing was timely, the claims must be examined on merits and rejection on limitation is unsustainable. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170356</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>