<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 739 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259865</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that services provided by the appellant to their parent organization constituted exports under the Export of Service Rules, 2005. The Tribunal emphasized that the service recipient&#039;s location determines the place of service provision, confirming that the service was rendered outside India. Therefore, the appeal was allowed, and the impugned order for a service tax demand and penalties was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 May 2015 00:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385843" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 739 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259865</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that services provided by the appellant to their parent organization constituted exports under the Export of Service Rules, 2005. The Tribunal emphasized that the service recipient&#039;s location determines the place of service provision, confirming that the service was rendered outside India. Therefore, the appeal was allowed, and the impugned order for a service tax demand and penalties was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259865</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>