https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259861 The appellant sought CENVAT credit on items for repair and maintenance, but was denied due to lack of documentation. The court found the issue debatable and waived the pre-deposit requirement, granting a stay against recovery during the appeal. The judgment emphasizes the need for detailed information on item usage and a thorough examination to determine eligibility for CENVAT credit on repair and maintenance inputs. en-us Fri, 07 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 23 May 2015 19:07:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259861 The appellant sought CENVAT credit on items for repair and maintenance, but was denied due to lack of documentation. The court found the issue debatable and waived the pre-deposit requirement, granting a stay against recovery during the appeal. The judgment emphasizes the need for detailed information on item usage and a thorough examination to determine eligibility for CENVAT credit on repair and maintenance inputs. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 07 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259861