<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 724 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259850</link>
    <description>The appeals were partly allowed, with specific issues remanded to the Assessing Officer for further verification. The tribunal provided detailed reasoning for each disallowance and addition, ensuring that the principles of commercial expediency and real income theory were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 May 2015 19:06:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385828" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 724 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259850</link>
      <description>The appeals were partly allowed, with specific issues remanded to the Assessing Officer for further verification. The tribunal provided detailed reasoning for each disallowance and addition, ensuring that the principles of commercial expediency and real income theory were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259850</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>