<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 718 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259844</link>
    <description>Regular audited books with stock records and no specific defects cannot be rejected merely to apply an inapplicable profit estimate under section 44AF, so the disallowance based on estimated net profit was not sustainable. The truck-related addition required fresh factual verification because the record did not conclusively establish the purchase, business use, and corresponding expenditure, so the issue was remanded for re-examination. Exemption under section 10(37) for enhanced compensation on compulsory acquisition of agricultural land was available on the facts, as the statutory conditions and relevant transfer date were satisfied, so the Revenue challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 May 2015 22:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385822" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 718 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259844</link>
      <description>Regular audited books with stock records and no specific defects cannot be rejected merely to apply an inapplicable profit estimate under section 44AF, so the disallowance based on estimated net profit was not sustainable. The truck-related addition required fresh factual verification because the record did not conclusively establish the purchase, business use, and corresponding expenditure, so the issue was remanded for re-examination. Exemption under section 10(37) for enhanced compensation on compulsory acquisition of agricultural land was available on the facts, as the statutory conditions and relevant transfer date were satisfied, so the Revenue challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259844</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>