<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (7) TMI 660 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170341</link>
    <description>The Board found in favor of the petitioners, concluding that the respondent company lacked evidence to support the alleged SEBI regulation violations and had no sufficient cause to refuse the transfer of shares. The appeals were allowed, directing the respondent company to register the transfer within one month. No costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 May 2015 13:41:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385806" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (7) TMI 660 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170341</link>
      <description>The Board found in favor of the petitioners, concluding that the respondent company lacked evidence to support the alleged SEBI regulation violations and had no sufficient cause to refuse the transfer of shares. The appeals were allowed, directing the respondent company to register the transfer within one month. No costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>