<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (8) TMI 836 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170342</link>
    <description>The CLB directed the respondent-company to register the transfer of shares within one month as the petitioner&#039;s acquisition was below the 5% threshold and no substantial evidence of SEBI regulation violations was found. The CLB emphasized free share transferability, deeming the respondent&#039;s refusal unjustified. Additionally, the respondent was instructed to register share transfers in two similar petitions by other companies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 May 2015 13:45:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385805" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (8) TMI 836 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170342</link>
      <description>The CLB directed the respondent-company to register the transfer of shares within one month as the petitioner&#039;s acquisition was below the 5% threshold and no substantial evidence of SEBI regulation violations was found. The CLB emphasized free share transferability, deeming the respondent&#039;s refusal unjustified. Additionally, the respondent was instructed to register share transfers in two similar petitions by other companies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170342</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>