https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170339 The applicant's simultaneous claim for rebate and duty drawback was deemed impermissible, leading to the rejection of the rebate claim. The applicant was, however, allowed to re-credit the duty paid amount into their Cenvat credit account. The Government emphasized that claiming double benefits is prohibited by law, and since the goods were not exported under bond as required, the duty payment was considered correct. The rejection of the rebate claim did not entitle the applicant to re-credit in the Cenvat account, and the Government upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) after considering relevant case laws and previous appellate orders. en-us Wed, 21 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 23 May 2015 11:55:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170339 The applicant's simultaneous claim for rebate and duty drawback was deemed impermissible, leading to the rejection of the rebate claim. The applicant was, however, allowed to re-credit the duty paid amount into their Cenvat credit account. The Government emphasized that claiming double benefits is prohibited by law, and since the goods were not exported under bond as required, the duty payment was considered correct. The rejection of the rebate claim did not entitle the applicant to re-credit in the Cenvat account, and the Government upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) after considering relevant case laws and previous appellate orders. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 21 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170339