https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170334 The Government rejected M/s. Auto Steels' revision application, upholding the Order-in-Appeal's decision to deny their rebate claim under Rule 18. Despite exporting goods under bond without paying excise duty under Rule 19, they sought rebate under Rule 18. The Government stressed the need for strict compliance with chosen export schemes' conditions and procedures. As the applicants exported under Rule 19, they were deemed ineligible for Rule 18 benefits. Adherence to prescribed procedures is crucial to prevent fraud, leading to the rejection of the rebate claim. en-us Tue, 12 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 May 2015 16:40:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170334 The Government rejected M/s. Auto Steels' revision application, upholding the Order-in-Appeal's decision to deny their rebate claim under Rule 18. Despite exporting goods under bond without paying excise duty under Rule 19, they sought rebate under Rule 18. The Government stressed the need for strict compliance with chosen export schemes' conditions and procedures. As the applicants exported under Rule 19, they were deemed ineligible for Rule 18 benefits. Adherence to prescribed procedures is crucial to prevent fraud, leading to the rejection of the rebate claim. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 12 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170334